x̄ - > "Rape during colonialism" - The Untold Truth

Uncovering the untold stories of rape in the slavery era.

 Sanitizing the truth is just but a waste of time as one day the secrets find their way to the top line. History is a significant source of our earlier life or the life lived by the people who we call our great great grandparents. We seek to know how they lived to help us find an anchor in our lives, and find direction. 

In history, we learn about colonialism, an era that left Africans paralyzed and begging up to date. Along with colonialism were the slave trade and perpetual economic exploitation. The slave trade highlights forced labor, low wages, and interracial prospects. However, our great great great grandparents forgot to mention rape and death, it feels like they lied.
Long ago during the slave trade era, slaves who were mostly men were enslaved together with their wives and children. This made them vulnerable. They were made to work forcefully to feed their children and avoid shameful acts of rape upon their wives. Our ancestors focused on racial prejudice and yet racial prejudice healed with time but the untold stories of rape as a means to acquire male slaves' cooperation were not only fully ignored but also brushed off the historic
books.
Fiction movies and stories told of Slavery barely mention rape as it sounds disgusting for a white male to rape a black woman. The term ‘white masculinity is no longer in our dictionaries as it hurts the ego of the Americans and might stir the Black Americans. It's not a scar anymore the wound is removed from the body part to avoid heartaches.
As blood is red, and Snow is white the bitter facts remain the same, uncovering the truth is so sad, and painful, and may cause anger. It makes the tears flow from your eyes like the movie, “Letters to God" It takes a part of you that will never be recovered, it opens your eyes but you
can’t do anything about it. But when all hope is gone and you are in despair you feel the power to want to change your present for a better tomorrow. Today you empower yourself with immense knowledge so that tomorrow you will want to tell your kids that the world is full of monsters, but you fought for their freedom and survival.

Yours intriguing

Drunk Esther 😎

x̄ - > Site perfomance Today Sunday, 7th February 2021

 Site performance

x̄ - > Gausian Dispersion repost 💚💜💛

Gaussian dispersion is simple to appreciate with its two boundaries: the mean μ focuses it and the stdev σ spreads it. Nonetheless, what is its nearest comparable on a discrete limited (or semi-limited) area? It is likewise significant for me to keep up the "boundaries" σ and μ on this discretized (and possibly limited) space since I need to control its middle and spread.

PS: Going through the rundown of discrete likelihood dissemination, some resemble "discretized" Gaussians however their boundaries aren't exactly the middle and spread utilized in Gaussians.

Gaus

Celebrating National Mathematics Day on 22nd December 2020 

 - Inspired by Physicist and Mathematician 

Carl Friedrich Gauss

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

x̄ - >Normality of a family repost 💚💜💛

Assume f:D∖0→C is insightful and z=0 is a fundamental peculiarity of f. Show that the family fn is characterized by fn(z)=f(z2n),z∈D∖0 isn’t typical in D∖0. 

My endeavor (roused on this): Assume that fn is a typical family in D∖0. So there exists from the grouping (fn)n a concurrent aftereffect (fn)nk with limit f^. 

Since f is insightful, it follows that f^ is logical on D∖0. 

We take an annulus An of internal range 1/3 and external sweep 1/2. At that point, we have that f^(A) is limited and on the grounds that fnk→f as k→∞, we have that fnk=f(A2nk) is limited for k huge enough. 

By the Cauchy equation for Laurent arrangement |a−j|≤rjmax|z|=r|f|. We pick r as the sweep of the hover contained in A/nk and letting k→∞. 

We at that point need to show that |a−j|=0 for each j≤−1 with the end goal that we infer that f is an insightful capacity on D which gives us an inconsistency. 

Be that as it may, in the last part I stalled out. 

Since, in such a case that k→∞ then r→0 and in light of the fact that f has a fundamental peculiarity in z=0: max|z|=r|f|→∞. 

So we have something of the structure 0⋅∞ which isn’t characterized. 

You have demonstrated that max|z|=rk|f| is consistently limited for rk=12⋅2nk thusly picking these radii in |a−j|≤rjmax|z|=r|f|. suggests that a−j=0 for j≥1. 

On the other hand one can contend as follows: f^ is limited on the circle |z|=1/2 and fnk→f^ consistently on that circle. 

It follows that |fnk(z)|≤M for |z|=12 with some M>0 and adequately larYou have demonstrated that max|z|=rk|f| is consistently limited for rk=12⋅2nk hence picking these radii in |a−j|≤rjmax|z|=r|f|. suggests that a−j=0 for j≥1. 

Then again one can contend as follows: f^ is limited on the circle |z|=1/2 and fnk→f^ consistently on that circle. 

It follows that |fnk(z)|≤M for |z|=12 with some M>0 and adequately enormous k. Made an interpretation of back to f this implies that |f(z)|≤M for |z|=12⋅2nk. 

So |f| is limited by M on those concentric circles. Utilizing the greatest modulus guideline it follows that a similar gauge holds in the annuli between those circles: |f(z)|≤M for 12⋅2nk+1≤|z|≤12⋅2nk. 

what’s more, that suggests that f is limited in a neighborhood of z=0. Utilizing Riemann’s hypothesis it follows that f has a removable peculiarity at z=0.ge k. 

Made an interpretation of back to f this implies that |f(z)|≤M for |z|=12⋅2nk. So |f| is limited by M on those concentric circles. 

Utilizing the most extreme modulus rule it follows that a similar gauge holds in the annuli between those circles: |f(z)|≤M for 12⋅2nk+1≤|z|≤12⋅2nk. furthermore, that suggests that f is limited in a neighborhood of z=0. Utilizing Riemann’s hypothesis it follows that f has a removable peculiarity at z=0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.